Seventeenth International Colloquium

Seoul, 2014 Constitution and Proceedings


Seventeenth International Colloquium

Original:Civil Procedure in Cross-Cultural Dialogue: Seoul Conference
Editors: Laura Ervo, Oscar G. Chase
Year: 2014
Publisher: Statut Publishing House
Language: English
ISBN: 978-5-8354-0874-0
Series: Colloquia Proceedings of the International Association of Procedural Law (IAPL)



Summary

🧭 Context and Purpose

This volume compiles the proceedings of the 2014 International Association of Procedural Law (IAPL) World Conference on Civil Procedure held in Seoul, South Korea, from October 1–4, 2014. The conference brought together scholars and practitioners from around the world to examine the evolution of civil procedure across various legal systems, with a particular focus on cross-cultural dialogue. The central theme explored how cultural contexts influence civil justice practices and the role of comparative civil procedure in fostering international dialogue.

🏛 Structure and Content Overview

Preface and Introduction

  • Preface: Outlines the objectives of the conference and the significance of re-evaluating civil procedure in diverse cultural contexts.
  • Introduction: Provides an overview of the themes addressed in the volume, including the impact of culture on civil justice practices and the importance of comparative analysis.

Part I – Comparative Civil Procedure: Global Perspectives

This section presents national reports from various countries, offering insights into their civil procedure systems:

  • South Korea: Examines the South Korean civil procedure system, highlighting its unique features and recent reforms.
  • Japan: Discusses Japan's civil procedure laws and their alignment with international standards.
  • China: Analyzes China's civil procedure system, focusing on its development and challenges.
  • India: Explores India's civil procedure laws and their adaptation to modern legal practices.
  • United States: Investigates the American civil procedure system, considering its alignment with global norms.
  • European Union: Reviews the EU's civil procedure framework and its impact on member states.

Part II – Cultural Dimensions of Civil Procedure

This section explores how cultural factors influence civil justice practices:

  • Legal Culture: Examines the role of legal culture in shaping civil procedure systems.
  • Judicial Independence: Discusses the importance of judicial independence in ensuring fair and impartial civil proceedings.
  • Access to Justice: Analyzes the challenges and solutions related to ensuring access to justice for all individuals.
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution: Investigates the role of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in civil justice systems.

🧠 Key Themes and Concepts

  • Legal Convergence: The movement towards harmonizing civil procedure laws across different legal systems.
  • Legal Transplants: The adoption and adaptation of legal concepts and procedures from one jurisdiction to another.
  • Judicial Roles: The evolving responsibilities and functions of judges in civil proceedings.
  • Expert Testimony: The changing nature of expert witness involvement in legal proceedings.
  • Legal Culture: The impact of cultural factors on the development and application of civil procedure laws.

🌍 Geographic and Jurisdictional Focus

  • South Korea: Emphasis on the South Korean civil procedure system and its reforms.
  • Japan: Analysis of Japan's civil procedure laws and their alignment with international standards.
  • China: Examination of China's civil procedure system and its development.
  • India: Discussion of India's civil procedure laws and their adaptation to modern legal practices.
  • United States: Investigation of the American civil procedure system and its global influence.
  • European Union: Review of the EU's civil procedure framework and its impact on member states.

Tags

Potential Search Tags

  • Civil procedure
  • Legal convergence
  • Legal transplants
  • Judicial roles
  • Expert testimony
  • Legal culture
  • Access to justice
  • Alternative dispute resolution
  • Comparative civil procedure
  • South Korea
  • Japan
  • China
  • India
  • United States
  • European Union